CONTACT US

12 MVP Compliance Frameworks — Continuously Scored from Your RMM Data

SynoGuard AI maps the telemetry your RMM and PSA already collect to all 12 MVP compliance frameworks simultaneously. A single control implementation can satisfy requirements across multiple frameworks at once — reducing evidence collection effort, eliminating duplicate work, and ensuring every client's posture is current across every framework they are subject to.

The 12 frameworks span healthcare (HIPAA), payment card (PCI-DSS v4.0), international standards (ISO 27001:2022), federal/defense (NIST CSF 2.0, NIST SP 800-171), service organizations (SOC 2), EU privacy and AI regulation (GDPR, EU AI Act, NIS2), financial services (FTC Safeguards), best practices (CIS Controls v8), and legal-industry controls.

CONTACT US

Cross-Framework Control Mapping

A single telemetry signal satisfies controls in multiple frameworks simultaneously. Device encryption status maps to HIPAA §164.312(a)(2)(iv), PCI-DSS Requirement 3.5, and ISO 27001 A.8.24 at the same time. SynoGuard AI handles the mapping automatically.

HIPAA Security Rule

Healthcare

The HIPAA Security Rule requires covered entities and business associates to implement administrative, physical, and technical safeguards to protect electronic Protected Health Information (ePHI). For MSPs serving healthcare clients, HIPAA compliance is a contractual and regulatory requirement — not optional. Fines reach $1.9M per violation category.

Key Control Areas

  • Administrative Safeguards: Security Officer designation, workforce training, access management, contingency planning
  • Physical Safeguards: Facility access controls, workstation use policies, device and media controls
  • Technical Safeguards: Access controls, audit controls, integrity controls, transmission security (TLS 1.2+)
  • Organizational Requirements: Business Associate Agreements (BAAs), policies and procedures

How SynoGuard AI Covers It

SynoGuard AI maps RMM telemetry to all 75 HIPAA Security Rule implementation specifications. Continuous scoring, drift detection, BAA tracking, WISP generation, and audit-ready evidence packs. vPenTest findings are automatically mapped to Security Rule controls.

Cross-Framework Mapping

HIPAA controls overlap significantly with NIST SP 800-171 and ISO 27001:2022. A single control implementation can satisfy requirements across all three frameworks simultaneously.

Documents Generated

WISP, Risk Assessment, Breach Notification template, Business Associate Agreement checklist

PCI-DSS v4.0

Payment Card

PCI-DSS v4.0 (effective March 2024) governs any organization that stores, processes, or transmits cardholder data. Version 4.0 introduces customized implementation options, expanded multi-factor authentication requirements, and stronger web application security controls. Non-compliance penalties can reach $100,000+ per month.

Key Control Areas

  • Requirements 1–2: Network security controls and secure configurations
  • Requirements 3–4: Protect stored account data and encrypt transmission
  • Requirements 5–6: Protect systems against malware and maintain secure systems
  • Requirements 7–9: Restrict access by business need, identify users, restrict physical access
  • Requirements 10–12: Log and monitor access, test security systems, maintain information security policy

How SynoGuard AI Covers It

SynoGuard AI maps RMM and vPenTest data to all 12 PCI-DSS v4.0 requirements. Patch compliance, AV status, network segmentation evidence, access control records, and log collection are pulled from existing RMM telemetry. vPenTest findings are mapped directly to PCI-DSS requirements.

Cross-Framework Mapping

PCI-DSS v4.0 Requirement 6 (secure systems) and Requirement 10 (logging) overlap with ISO 27001:2022 Annex A and CIS Controls. Cross-framework mapping reduces duplicate evidence collection.

Documents Generated

SAQ pre-population, Compensating Control Worksheet template, evidence pack for QSA review

ISO 27001:2022

International Standard

ISO 27001:2022 is the international standard for Information Security Management Systems (ISMS). The 2022 revision restructured Annex A from 114 to 93 controls across 4 themes (Organizational, People, Physical, Technological). It is increasingly required by enterprise clients and cyber-insurance carriers.

Key Control Areas

  • Organizational Controls (A.5): Policies, roles, threat intelligence, asset management, supplier relationships
  • People Controls (A.6): Screening, terms of employment, awareness, disciplinary process
  • Physical Controls (A.7): Physical security perimeters, equipment maintenance, clear desk
  • Technological Controls (A.8): User endpoints, privileged access, malware protection, logging, cryptography, SDLC

How SynoGuard AI Covers It

SynoGuard AI maps RMM telemetry to all 93 ISO 27001:2022 Annex A controls. Continuous scoring, Statement of Applicability (SoA) generation, risk register maintenance, and audit evidence packs. Supports ISO 27001 certification readiness for MSP clients.

Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 27001:2022 Annex A.8 (Technological Controls) overlaps extensively with NIST CSF, CIS Controls, and HIPAA Technical Safeguards. Cross-mapping is automatic.

Documents Generated

Statement of Applicability (SoA) template, risk register, internal audit checklist

NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF 2.0)

Federal / Best Practice

The NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF 2.0, released 2024) is the most widely adopted cybersecurity framework in the United States. It organizes controls into six functions: Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, and Recover. It is referenced by cyber-insurance carriers, federal contractors, and regulated industries as a baseline.

Key Control Areas

  • Govern (GV): Organizational context, risk management strategy, roles and responsibilities
  • Identify (ID): Asset management, risk assessment, improvement
  • Protect (PR): Identity management, awareness training, data security, platform security, resilience
  • Detect (DE): Continuous monitoring, adverse event analysis
  • Respond (RS): Incident management, analysis, mitigation, reporting
  • Recover (RC): Incident recovery, communication

How SynoGuard AI Covers It

SynoGuard AI maps all six NIST CSF 2.0 functions to RMM and PSA telemetry. Continuous scoring, gap analysis, and CSF Profile generation. vPenTest findings are mapped to NIST CSF Identify and Detect functions automatically.

Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST CSF is the most cross-referenced framework. It maps to HIPAA, PCI-DSS, ISO 27001, NIST SP 800-171, CIS Controls, and SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria simultaneously.

Documents Generated

CSF Profile, gap analysis report, cyber-insurance scorecard

NIST SP 800-171

Federal / Defense

NIST SP 800-171 governs the protection of Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) in non-federal systems. It is required for all DoD contractors and subcontractors under DFARS 252.204-7012, and forms the basis of CMMC (Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification). Non-compliance can result in contract termination and False Claims Act liability.

Key Control Areas

  • 14 control families: Access Control, Awareness and Training, Audit and Accountability, Configuration Management
  • Identification and Authentication, Incident Response, Maintenance, Media Protection
  • Personnel Security, Physical Protection, Risk Assessment, Security Assessment
  • System and Communications Protection, System and Information Integrity
  • 110 security requirements total across all 14 families

How SynoGuard AI Covers It

SynoGuard AI maps RMM telemetry to all 110 NIST SP 800-171 security requirements. Continuous scoring, System Security Plan (SSP) generation, Plan of Action and Milestones (POA&M) maintenance, and CMMC readiness assessment. Critical for MSPs serving defense contractors.

Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-171 is derived from NIST SP 800-53 and overlaps significantly with NIST CSF, ISO 27001:2022, and CIS Controls. Cross-mapping reduces evidence collection effort by up to 60%.

Documents Generated

System Security Plan (SSP), Plan of Action & Milestones (POA&M), CMMC readiness assessment

SOC 2 (AICPA TSC)

Service Organization

SOC 2 reports on a service organization's controls relevant to the AICPA Trust Services Criteria (TSC): Security (CC), Availability (A), Processing Integrity (PI), Confidentiality (C), and Privacy (P). Type II reports cover a 6–12 month period and are increasingly required by enterprise clients and cyber-insurance carriers.

Key Control Areas

  • CC1–CC9: Common Criteria (Security) — logical access, change management, risk management, monitoring
  • A1: Availability — system availability commitments and capacity management
  • PI1: Processing Integrity — complete, valid, accurate, timely processing
  • C1: Confidentiality — information designated as confidential is protected
  • P1–P8: Privacy — personal information collection, use, retention, and disposal

How SynoGuard AI Covers It

SynoGuard AI maps RMM and PSA telemetry to SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria. Continuous evidence collection for CC6 (logical access), CC7 (system operations), and CC9 (vendor risk). Vendor Risk Management module provides evidence for CC9.2 (vendor monitoring). Supports SOC 2 Type II readiness.

Cross-Framework Mapping

SOC 2 CC6 (logical access) and CC7 (monitoring) overlap with ISO 27001:2022 A.8, NIST CSF Protect and Detect, and CIS Controls. Cross-framework mapping is automatic.

Documents Generated

SOC 2 readiness assessment, evidence collection pack, vendor monitoring report (CC9.2)

GDPR

EU Privacy

The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) applies to any organization processing personal data of EU residents, regardless of where the organization is located. For MSPs, GDPR creates obligations as both data controllers (for employee data) and data processors (for client personal data). Fines can reach €20M or 4% of global annual revenue.

Key Control Areas

  • Article 5: Principles of lawfulness, fairness, transparency, purpose limitation, data minimization
  • Article 25: Data protection by design and by default
  • Article 28: Processor obligations — Data Processing Agreements (DPAs)
  • Article 32: Security of processing — appropriate technical and organizational measures
  • Article 33–34: Breach notification (72-hour notification to supervisory authority)
  • Article 35: Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs) for high-risk processing

How SynoGuard AI Covers It

SynoGuard AI maps RMM telemetry to GDPR Article 32 security requirements. Data Processing Agreement (DPA) template generation, breach detection and 72-hour notification workflow, DPIA support, and cross-border transfer documentation. Vendor Risk module provides Article 28 processor assessment questionnaires.

Cross-Framework Mapping

GDPR Article 32 security requirements overlap with ISO 27001:2022, NIST CSF, and SOC 2. The EU AI Act (also covered) adds additional obligations for MSPs using or deploying AI systems.

Documents Generated

Data Processing Agreement template, DPIA template, breach notification workflow, Article 30 Records of Processing Activities

CIS Critical Security Controls v8

Best Practice

The CIS Critical Security Controls (CIS Controls v8) are 18 prioritized controls developed by the Center for Internet Security. They are organized into three Implementation Groups (IG1, IG2, IG3) based on organizational risk profile. IG1 represents the minimum baseline for all organizations. CIS Controls are widely referenced by cyber-insurance carriers.

Key Control Areas

  • CIS 1–2: Inventory and Control of Enterprise Assets and Software
  • CIS 3–4: Data Protection and Secure Configuration
  • CIS 5–6: Account Management and Access Control Management
  • CIS 7–8: Continuous Vulnerability Management and Audit Log Management
  • CIS 9–12: Email/Web Browser Protections, Malware Defenses, Data Recovery, Network Infrastructure
  • CIS 13–18: Network Monitoring, Security Awareness, Service Provider Management, Application Security, Incident Response, Penetration Testing

How SynoGuard AI Covers It

SynoGuard AI maps RMM telemetry to all 18 CIS Controls and 153 Safeguards. Asset inventory (CIS 1–2), patch management (CIS 7), AV/EDR status (CIS 10), and log collection (CIS 8) are all pulled from existing RMM data. vPenTest findings map to CIS 18 (Penetration Testing). Cyber-insurance scorecard generation included.

Cross-Framework Mapping

CIS Controls are explicitly mapped to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and PCI-DSS in the CIS Controls v8 mapping document. SynoGuard AI uses this mapping to satisfy multiple frameworks from a single CIS control implementation.

Documents Generated

CIS Controls Implementation Group assessment, cyber-insurance scorecard, IG1 baseline report

FTC Safeguards Rule

Financial Services

The FTC Safeguards Rule (updated 2023) requires non-bank financial institutions — including auto dealerships, mortgage brokers, tax preparers, and financial advisors — to implement a comprehensive information security program. The 2023 update added specific technical requirements including encryption, MFA, and penetration testing.

Key Control Areas

  • Designated Qualified Individual (QI) responsible for the information security program
  • Risk assessment covering customer information systems
  • Safeguards: Access controls, encryption, MFA, secure development practices
  • Monitoring and testing: Continuous monitoring or annual penetration testing + biannual vulnerability assessments
  • Incident response plan with 30-day notification to FTC for breaches affecting 500+ customers
  • Annual reporting to the Board of Directors

How SynoGuard AI Covers It

SynoGuard AI maps RMM telemetry to FTC Safeguards Rule requirements. MFA status, encryption verification, access control records, and patch compliance are pulled from existing RMM data. vPenTest findings satisfy the penetration testing requirement. Annual Board report generation included.

Cross-Framework Mapping

FTC Safeguards Rule requirements overlap significantly with NIST CSF, CIS Controls IG1, and GLBA. For financial services MSP clients, cross-framework mapping reduces compliance overhead substantially.

Documents Generated

Information Security Program template, risk assessment, Board report, QI designation documentation

EU NIS2 Directive

EU Critical Infrastructure

The EU NIS2 Directive (effective October 2024) significantly expands the scope of the original NIS Directive. It covers 'essential' and 'important' entities across 18 sectors including energy, transport, health, digital infrastructure, and managed service providers. MSPs are explicitly included as 'important entities' under NIS2. Penalties can reach €10M or 2% of global annual revenue.

Key Control Areas

  • Article 21: Risk management measures — incident handling, business continuity, supply chain security, network security, access control, encryption, MFA
  • Article 23: Incident reporting — 24-hour early warning, 72-hour notification, final report within 1 month
  • Article 26: Jurisdiction — MSPs are subject to NIS2 in the EU member state where they are established
  • Supply chain security — MSPs must assess and manage cybersecurity risks of their own suppliers
  • Management body accountability — senior management is personally liable for NIS2 compliance

How SynoGuard AI Covers It

SynoGuard AI maps RMM telemetry to NIS2 Article 21 risk management measures. Incident detection and 24-hour/72-hour notification workflow, supply chain risk assessment (via Vendor Risk module), MFA and encryption verification, and management accountability reporting. Critical for MSPs with EU operations.

Cross-Framework Mapping

NIS2 Article 21 requirements overlap with ISO 27001:2022, NIST CSF, and GDPR Article 32. For MSPs operating in the EU, a combined NIS2/GDPR/ISO 27001 compliance program is the most efficient approach.

Documents Generated

NIS2 incident notification templates, supply chain risk assessment, management accountability report

EU AI Act

AI Regulation

The EU AI Act (effective August 2024, phased enforcement through 2027) is the world's first comprehensive AI regulation. It classifies AI systems into four risk tiers: Unacceptable Risk (prohibited), High Risk (conformity assessment required), Limited Risk (transparency obligations), and Minimal Risk. MSPs deploying or using AI tools in EU client environments must assess and document their AI systems.

Key Control Areas

  • Article 5: Prohibited AI practices — social scoring, real-time biometric surveillance, subliminal manipulation
  • Articles 8–15: High-risk AI requirements — risk management system, data governance, technical documentation, transparency, human oversight, accuracy and robustness
  • Article 52: Transparency obligations for limited-risk AI (chatbots, deepfakes)
  • Article 53: GPAI model obligations for general-purpose AI providers
  • Annex III: High-risk AI systems — biometrics, critical infrastructure, education, employment, essential services, law enforcement, migration, justice

How SynoGuard AI Covers It

SynoGuard AI's AI Ethics module classifies all detected AI systems by EU AI Act risk tier, identifies prohibited AI uses, flags high-risk AI systems requiring conformity assessment, and generates EU AI Act Compliance Reports. The AI Ethics Registry provides the documentation required for EU AI Act compliance. Responsible AI framework alignment includes NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001, and IEEE 7000.

Cross-Framework Mapping

EU AI Act obligations for high-risk AI systems overlap with GDPR Article 22 (automated decision-making), ISO 42001 (AI management systems), and NIST AI RMF. SynoGuard AI's AI Ethics module covers all four simultaneously.

Documents Generated

EU AI Act Compliance Report, AI system inventory by risk tier, conformity assessment documentation template

Questions about framework coverage?

Contact us to discuss which frameworks apply to your MSP clients and how SynoGuard AI maps your existing RMM data to them.

CONTACT US